Editors who beg

Jordan Lapp November 15th, 2007

EDIT: Looks like Mr. Knight has reposted the entry in the thread, and removed the text that I was complaining in this post. Kudos to him. 

I recently ran across this thread at SFReader.com. In it, Edward Knight literarlly begs for speculative fiction readers to buy his new anthology Unparalleled Journeys II. By doing so, he had just guaranteed that I, for one, won’t be reading.

There is a definite stigma in our industry against publishers who solicit authors to buy their own work or the work of authors they know personally. This marketing ploy has be employed (effectively, unfortunately) by vanity publisher PublishAmerica, who, as you can see from the link I’ve provided, has acquired a reputation as a scam publisher.

Why does this stigma exist? Well, it boils down to what kind of services publishers provide. In these days of easy Print On Demand publishing, where authors can literally have their books in their hands without any outside help within a week, a publishing house has to add value in order to remain pertinent. In theory, that value comes in the form of selling your books. By going through a publishing house, an author should be able to sell more books than if they had self-published (or else what’s the point?).

Now, an author can easily sell to their friends, and doesn’t have much difficult selling in the tight knit speculative fiction community. So where does that leave the publisher? Well, responsible publishers try to sell to the general public, either on much trafficked websites or in bookstores, and some do so very successfully. Those who don’t berate potential authors for not promoting or buying books they have no interest in.

It’s a bad sign that Journey Books Publishing feels that they have to beg for readers. I wish Edward Knight all the luck in the world, but I, for one, will not be reading.

Every Day Fiction dot com

Jordan Lapp July 30th, 2007

Hey guys,

Sorry it’s been so quiet around here, but I’ve been working on my SUPER SECRET project, which, as you can guess from the title of this post, has already been revealed!

 That’s right, together with Camille Gooderham Campbell and Steven Smethurst, I’ve started a flash fiction magazine with the lofty goal of publishing a work of fiction of less than 1000 words in length every day.

We intend for Every Day Fiction dot com to fill a few niches. First, we intended to create a magazine that can be read with a minimum commitment of time. Web surfers spend a depressingly short amount of time on a site and attention spans are getting shorter. Here’s where Every Day Fiction steps in. Our goal is to provide a story that can be read in 20 minutes or less. We’re targetting office workers on their lunch, students on transit, teachers looking for examples for their classes, and even home surfers looking for some brain candy.

Our second goal was to help other authors. Our intention was to provide a venue where talented authors can advertise their work. Since we link to wherever the author would like us to, their story with us becomes an ad for them. We can drive traffic to their work on Amazon, their personal sites, or even a favorite forum. In addition to our token payment, they get a lot of free advertising.

The response so far has been outstanding. With a month to go before our launch in September we have over 100 subscribers, so your work will get read. We’ve got some truly incredible submissions that we can’t wait to publish, but with such an aggressive publication schedule, we will need more. Keep ‘em coming!

How to Handle Markets That “Only Respond on Acceptance”

Jordan Lapp July 15th, 2007

Slushpile 
So, Steve Goble ranted about what to do about markets that only respond to accepted submissions. I know Adbusters is such a market. Check out number 5 on their submission guidelines:

5. If we like your idea we will be in touch. It may take months, so be patient.

Read between the lines. They’re saying, “We’ll hold on to your work for an arbitrary amount of time and only contact you if we want it. Otherwise, keep waiting suckers!” 

This kind of policy is condescending in the extreme and disrepectful of writers. I mean, it takes all of perhaps 30 seconds to fill out a form rejection, probably less, and yet each of us labours weeks and months on our pieces. It boggles the mind how any magazine that treats its contributors this way can survive. The problem is that these magazines pay well, and therefore will always find a few willing victims.

I’ve heard a writers suggest a boycott. I (of course) have something more evil in mind.

SEND THEM EVERYTHING.

Yes, you heard me. Screw their “no simultaneous submissions policy”. Forget about their “no multiple submissions” (How could you know which pieces they’re still considering, right?). Who cares if it’s not in their genre? Make them waste the 30 seconds they saved by not responding to you in the first place. 

What if they respond and say the want to buy your work? If it’s still unsold, thank them, pocket their check, and keep going. If it’s sold, apologize and explain that you didn’t hear back so you thought they weren’t interested.

 These magazines don’t respect writers, why should we treat them any different?

* I think this idea has some legs. If these guys start getting overwhelmed by the slush, maybe they’ll change their ways. Please send this posting out to every writer you know and get them to blog about it. Maybe if we all work together we can actually convince these guys to change!

Markets for New Writers: Anotherealm

Jordan Lapp July 5th, 2007

Anotherealm banner 
Hey guys,

Music to write by: “I Want You to Want Me” by Cheap Trick

Welcome to post 8 in the Markets for New Writers series. If you missed it, the previous post was on the print and e-zine Andromeda Spaceways Inflight Magazine.

Next up: Anotherealm.

Background

Founded in 1999, Anotherealm magazine is a monthly webzine focusing on speculative fiction of all kinds. It is famous for hosting Preditors & Editors (the misspelling is intentional) which has been the focus of a previous article.**

Why is the magazine attractive to you?

 Let’s face it, a webzine that’s been around since 1999 has some cred. Unfortunately, because the site’s recently been hacked (and since restored), I couldn’t find many names of authors who’ve been published there, but I know this author had a flash fiction piece in their summer 2006 issue.

The fact that they host Preditors & Editors is also a Big Deal, since it guarantees the magazine gets a lot of traffic. They also host an annual Readers’ Poll which votes on which are the best online stories/magazines/etc.

Anotherealm is also responsible for awarding the Anotherealm Editors Choice Award, The Goldberg Horror Award, and the Annual Higney Award so if you get a story published here, you have the chance to win one of these resume boosters.

Genre

Fantasy, Horror, Sci-Fi. Hard Sci-Fi is always welcomed.

Max Word Count

5,000

Payment

$25

Submission Guidelines are here.

** As a quick note, I have to apologize for the lack of background information on some of these magazines. Basically, I rely on their “about” page, Google, and forums where the magazine is discussed, and if any one of these is missing you get a short article. I’ve taken to e-mailing editors, but sometimes response times can be a little slow.

Scalzi Vs. Wikipedia

Jordan Lapp July 3rd, 2007

Hey guys,

If you’ve been following the Whatever recently, you’ll know that John Scalzi reported on the death of Fred Saberhagen. I loved Saberhagen’s Lost Swords series (or the first part of it anyways) and even read some of his Berserker Series. I am saddened by the news of his death.

Unfortunately, the battle over Saberhagen’s Wikipedia entry has eclipsed his passing. When the battle was over, instead of letting things be, Scalzi compounded the problem. When his original posting was FARKed Scalzi updated it with this:

Hey there, Farkers. Nice to see you. And if you’re looking for even more snark before you head back out, check out this. Yes, apparently I’m full of piss and vinegar the last couple of days.

Scalzi is turning Saberhagen’s death into a circus, and, as the above entry shows, trying to skate free publicity out of it.

For shame, Mr. Scalzi.

« Prev - Next »