Savaged.

At Clarion West, we are issued tickets at the start of each week, maybe four or five of them. If we go over time, or start with a negative critique, or don’t get around to critiquing someone, we are supposed to throw the tickets into the centre of the room. At the end of the week, we put all the remaining tickets into a bowl and we draw for prizes like books and toys. Obviously, these tickets are fairly valuable, although very occasionally (maybe five times so far), someone will have a lot to say about a particular story and cast their tickets in.

Three people cast tickets in for my story.

Everyone agreed there wasn’t much problem with my prose (although one person described it as “workman”, which I’m not sure is entirely fair. Flowery, no. But workman? D&D writers are workman. I figure I’m a little more metaphorical than that). But nearly every other aspect of the piece was criticized. Only one person caught that one of my main characters was named Sally Hemings, and he thought it might have been for shock value. I held the Versimiltoad close to me the entire time.

I’m feeling pretty beat up. People tried to tell me that it was a good thing that my story meritted three tickets, but praise was thin. Few people understood the message I was trying to impart in the piece. At least, people found the rape to be inoffensive, which is what I thought would be the tricky part, so I guess I succeeded there.

I feel like a fraud. I won Writers of the Future, but my stories keep getting savaged. I’m sure everyone is asking themselves right now just how the hell I did it. I wish I’d never said anything at all about it, except that I thought it might help in my application essay (Turns out it doesn’t. They do no good).

I think that I tried to write an amazing work of literature, and I’m just not good enough yet to do that. I’m a beginning writer who’s not particularly well read, and I was arrogant enough to try and make a “Statement”. I need to just accept that right now, I need to learn how to write a “Story” well, and not set my sights any higher.

My next piece, “IN THE SHAPE OF A MAN” is going to be a fluff piece. Hopefully original and awesome, but no messages this time. Pure escapism. I hope it’s better received.

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 2nd, 2009 at 1:28 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

3 Comments(+Add)

1   Matthew Rotundo    http://matthewsrotundo.livejournal.com
July 2nd, 2009 at 4:25 pm

Brother, I’ve been there. Know exactly how it feels. You’ll get through it. Trust me.

2   Oso    http://osomuerte.wordpress.com
July 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Sounds like you were beat up pretty bad, so don’t beat yourself up. You can write. You know good writing when you see it. (EDF bought my story, right?)

CW is the right place to push yourself, try new things. How long would it take me to find out what you found out today? And, for the record, it doesn’t take three tickets to say “this crap wasn’t worth my time and can’t be salvaged”.

Feel free to write fluffy stuff, but make sure you write another statement story while you’re there. You have something to say; you have the skill to tell it.

Like Mur Lafferty says, you are allowed to write crap. (Not saying Versimilitoad was crap, but it would be okay if it was.) Everyone does it. Playing it safe is squandering an opportunity.

End of pep talk. Go write.

3   gay degani    
July 3rd, 2009 at 2:41 pm

Jordan, there’s really no such thing as crap. There’s only unfinished work. Rest assured that your piece has more good things about it than bad, but we get workshopped for the most part to find out what we need to work on.

That means negative thoughts and negative criticism. It happens a lot in this kind of set up. People want to help so they tell you what they didn’t like. It’s a rare person who searches to find the good stuff. That stuff is usually taken as not something necessary to say.

You are a wonderful writer.

Obviously these people think you are too because usually in groups like that if you don’t think a writer is on to something, you don’t bother to read it closely enough to come up with lots to say.

Leave a reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment