Cormac McCarthy’s The Road

Hey guys,

Music to write by: “Love in an Elevator“ by Aerosmith

So I finished The Neverending Story by Michael Ende*in record time on my vacation and found myself in O’Hare airport with nothing to read. The only thing even faintly sci-fi in the pitiful bookstore I visited was Cormac McCarthy’s The Road.

I picked it up because it’s the story of a man and a boy walking across a post-apocalyptic America in search of the world’s last canned food. Two things about this appealed to me. Another member of my writing group, Andrew LeBlanc, is writing a screenplay called “High Nuclear Noon on the Radiation Range” which is a similar and yet disturbingly different idea, and Oprah actually picked it for her book club. Which, in theory, should give the rest of us genre writers hope.

It doesn’t.

Judging from the writing, McCarthy is one of those pretentious literary authors who believe that the english language is their bitch. Commas have been deemed irrevalent. Contractions like can’t and don’t have had their apostrophes amputated (but, interestingly enough, “it’s” still has its punctuation (I’ll riff on this in the comments if anyone prompts me)). Mercifully, dialogue is given its own line (but no quotes). Even the lowly sentence isn’t spared. Check out some of these gems…

Deep stone flutes where the water dripped and sang.

Until they stood in a great stone room where lay a black and ancient lake.

Its bowels, its beating heart. (okay, I lied, there are SOME commas but they’re as rare as a virgin on Hollywood Boulevard.)

Now, I’m an English minor, and thus, I was forced to read such literary excrement as James Joyce’s Potrait of an Artist as a Young Man, and To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf. Normal humans don’t like these books. In fact, both were self-published. Even my lit prof, whose job it is to like Joyce, claimed that Joyce’s third book, Finnegan’s Wake was basically unreadable. You need to reach a certain level of pretentiousness before you can get into these books, and thankfully I haven’t hit that point yet.

Now, I’m not saying that McCarthy’s book is horrible. It’s a pain to read because of the above issues, but it’s actually quite well written. My objection is that he’s trying to artificially make his book literary by using these parlour tricks. He’s saying, “Look at me, I’m so good that you can like the book even though it’s a pain to read.” There’s a certain segment of the literary community that will like the book simply because of these parlour tricks. In my opinion, the book gained absolutely nothing from these stylistic indulgences.

I’ve said this before about Joyce’s work, and I’ll say it again about McCarthy’s. A great writer should be able to write masterpieces without resorting to Stupid Pet Tricks. Sure, break the rules if it adds to the work. In The Road, they don’t. McCarthy’s tactic is a cheap trick to get attention from the literary community. Unfortunately, it seems to have worked.

*The Neverending Story, the novel, is much, much better than the movie. The movie only covered the first third of the book, and the rest of the book is truly awesome. For instance, Bastain ends up raising an army and attacking Atreyu. The Ivory Tower is burnt to the ground. Many of the books true life lessons are contained in the last part of the book. It’s for kids for sure, but adults will love it. Highly suggested reading.

This entry was posted on Friday, May 18th, 2007 at 7:26 pm and is filed under The craft. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

15 Comments(+Add)

1   Ty    http://tyjohnston.blogspot.com/
May 18th, 2007 at 11:41 pm

Um … well, not having read any of McCarthy’s work, I can’t really comment upon it other then “yeah, I hate the stupid tricks, too.”

However, every time I see his name in a bookstore, I start giggling. I always think about Robert E. Howard’s Irish warrior, Cormac Mac Art. And it’s funny to imagine Howard’s Cormac as a writer.

2   James Boone Dryden    http://sheerspec.blogspot.com
May 19th, 2007 at 8:42 am

I would have to agree with the ending / last section of The Never-Ending Story. I still think it’s one of the best modern fairy tales of the 20th century.

As to this Cormac McCarthy: I won’t read it. If what you say is true, then it sounds like a terrible endeavor. I would rather read Jane Austen.

3   Steve Goble    http://www.stevegoble.com
May 19th, 2007 at 10:08 pm

I didn’t much appreciate the punctuation oddities in “The Road,” and see no reason whatsoever for a writer to indulge in such. That said, “The Road” is one hell of an effective book, in my opinion. I don’t think the punctuation or lack thereof had anything to do with the decision to give the guy any literary prizes. It’s a damn good book, even if the punctuation bugs me.

– Steve

4   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
May 20th, 2007 at 9:26 am

Ty,

Howard? The only thing I’ve read by him is Conan. Are the Irish Warrior stories any good?

James,

The Road is excellent writing. I’m hooked. My objection was that the lack of punctuation adds nothing to the story and feels like a cheap ploy to appear literary. You should read it simply because it’s sci-fi and Oprah chose it for her book club (which makes you an instant millionaire).

Steve,

Totally agree with your comment. Well said. Why in the heck do you think he chose not to use commas though?

5   Steve Goble    http://www.stevegoble.com
May 20th, 2007 at 1:08 pm

I have no idea why he chose to omit commas and apostrophes and quote marks. I’ve never really seen any strong literary argument for doing so. It strikes me as a “fashionable” sort of thing, perhaps justified as “thinking outside the box” or “going beyond the restrictive rules, man, and letting the WORDS do their thing.”

But honestly — and I’ve made this point elsewhere — leaving out punctuation and indulging in such stylistic froo-frah accomplished nothing but pointing out their absence. Because McCarthy left them out, I spent part of the time I should have been absorbed in his story wondering why the hell he did that. If he had used punctuation the way we’re all taught to use it, I wouldn’t have thought about punctuation AT ALL while I was reading his gripping book.

In my opinion, “The Road” is a worthwhile book despite the literary pecadillos. Why McCarthy chose to risk making readers stumble over something as silly as puncuation — heck I dunno. You’d have to ask him.

– Steve

6   Ty    http://tyjohnston.blogspot.com/
May 21st, 2007 at 10:20 pm

Jordan, in my opinion, anything by Howard is worth reading.
Kull, Solomon Kane, Cormac, even the westerns and boxing stories.

Andrew J. Offutt also wrote 6 or 7 Cormac books back in the 70s. Some of them were good, others not, but all entertaining to some degree or other. I’ve only read 2 of them from front to back, but I’ve got the others and have perused them a bit. Between Howard and Offutt, you’ll definitely learn a lot about pre-Christian Ireland.

7   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
May 22nd, 2007 at 8:00 am

Right now, I guess I’m wary of reading anything that was written a while ago. What I read influences what I write, and Howard’s style is not in favour right now.

I love him, but I’m going to wait a while before checking his other stuff out.

8   Andrew LeBlanc    http://www.criticaloddness.com/blog
May 22nd, 2007 at 10:46 am

And of course, you forget to mention that it was, in fact, my copy of The Neverending Story you were reading.

I bought The Road well before it was recommended by Oprah, but I still haven’t gotten around to reading it. Now I’m putting it at the top of the list. Not because of Oprah.

9   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
May 23rd, 2007 at 1:29 pm

And there you have it folks. For one reader at least, the Jordan Lapp Book Club holds more weight than Opera’s. I’m so proud!

10   Suanne Warr    http://www.suannewarr.com/blog
May 23rd, 2007 at 6:59 pm

Perhaps I’m just jaded by my hate of pretentious ‘literary’ snobbishness, and perhaps I’m also too commercially oriented and therefore more likely to point fingers…

But I say McCarthy is highly unlikely to have a legitimate reason to leave out the commas and mess with the structure. He did it in order to give the literary world a secret handsahke that he was a ‘nonconformist’ and ‘innovative’ writer of literature, rather than a money-grubbing genre writer like the rest of us.

The irony, of course, is that he will thereby make bucketloads of money.

PS to Jordan. It may just be my contacts getting blurry, but I missed your asterisk on the Neverending Story and so sat there trying to figure out how the last bit fit logically with the subject before. Maybe making your footnote a smaller font would help?

11   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
May 24th, 2007 at 7:25 am

Suanne,

Good suggestion about the asterisk. Maybe italics?

McCarthy’s other book are all relatively normal punctuation wise. One person I talked to said these literary tricks made the book feel like a poem, to which I responded: Even poems have punctuation…

12   K.C. Ball    http://kcball.wordpress.com
June 1st, 2010 at 10:43 am

Read the book three years ago; just saw the movie adaptation via On Demand. I’ve read a couple of his other books, as well. God, the man has a bleak view of the human race.

As far as the book, to paraphrase Gump: pretentious is as pretentious does.

13   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
June 14th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

Hey KC,

I think McCarthy is just fascinated with looking at genre ideas the way they really would be. The Road is much closer to a post-apocalyptic world than Mad Max.

It’s official! I’m going to WotF this summer. You’d better be there!

14   The Expriest    
July 21st, 2011 at 12:18 pm

Who cares if it doesn’t follow all of the rules enforced in your 3rd grade English class? There are still words that work to tell a compelling, beautifully-written story. I had no idea that some people need pauses to think where commas should be placed. Perhaps books should come with a little hand for the reader to hold while they get through the book.

Also, if Joyce and McCarthy’s bad writing, then what’s good? Is Harry Potter and the Da Vinci Code really that awesome? Ulysses and Blood Meridian are two of the best books ever written.

15   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
July 21st, 2011 at 12:30 pm

Wow. Totally weird that you’d jump onto a random blog and spit at a post published over a year ago with such antipathy…

Since your reading skills seem to be about as good as your grasp of grammar, I’ll quote my above post, “[McCarthy’s book] is a pain to read because of the above issues, but it’s actually quite well written.”

My objection was that I felt he was taking a standard sci-fi story and artificially making it more “literary” by messing with the grammar–when I thought it did nothing to advance the story.

As for Joyce, I haven’t read Ulysses, and thus didn’t comment on it. Portrait was inane and nonsensical.

Also if you really believe this: “I had no idea that some people need pauses to think where commas should be placed” then you’re an idiot. The fact that we have such a thing as a comma in the English language should indicate that, in fact, people do need commas to show where pauses should be.

One Trackback/Ping

  1. But He’s A Literary Genius! « The Phoenix Rises!    Aug 30 2010 / 1pm:

    [...]  The first link I happened upon on the first page of my Google search: Is Cormac McCarthy a literary or genre writer? which makes a good point that McCarthy is trying “artificially make his [...]

Leave a reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment