If you only saw the Butterfly Effect in the theaters, it’s time to gave it another look.

First time I saw this movie was on DVD, and I thought it was amazing. It was almost perfectly constructed, with only one notable plot hole (where Ashton’s character stabs himself in the hands). I wondered at the time why it wasn’t a bigger hit.

Then I watched the Theatrical version on DVD. Wow. The ending was terrible. And I mean terrible. It’s tough not to discuss this without giving away what happens, but let’s just say that the Director’s Cut, while extremely awesome, might have been a little too challenging for the American Public, whereas the Theatrical Version was probably Watered-Down But Acceptable.

I noticed that it was the writers themselves who directed this movie, so that neatly explains its dual nature. They shot the movie they wrote, showed it to a producer who was all like, “you can’t show that to the American Public”, and were forced to re-shoot with the horrible compromise.

The message here is that if writers direct a movie, you should listen to them. Produces gave the Wachowski Brothers a lot of leeway and we got the Matrix. Matt Damon and Ben Affleck gave us Good Will Hunting. I feel certain the Butterfly Effect would have enjoyed the same success if Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber had been able to make the movie they wanted to make.

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 8th, 2009 at 1:51 pm and is filed under Rants. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

7 Comments(+Add)

1   Andrew LeBlanc    http://www.criticaloddness.com
January 8th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

The Wachowski Brothers also gave you the Matrix sequels. Sometimes there’s a balance to be maintained between enabling the writers to bring a whole, cohesive vision to the screen, and giving them a whole lot of money to shoot their first draft.

I hated Butterfly Effect. Saw it in theatres. Hated its guts. I can’t say I loved the director’s cut, I still think it contained some profound crappiness of writing in the small scale, but the most important thing, the larger scale, the story, worked. I respected it. It was like a good episode of The Outer Limits, at movie length.

Another thing you should never do is fuck with Ridley Scott. Kingdom of Heaven made me furious at its nonsensical suckiness in theatres. The director’s cut is magnificent. Forty minutes longer and feels an hour shorter than the theatrical version… it restores motivation and logic and momentum to the picture, making it one of my favourites of that year. It could have made a real dent at the Academy Awards too, I think, if they’d released Ridley’s original version.

2   jordan    http://www.everydayfiction.com
January 8th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

Touche on the Wachowski Brothers’ sequels. You and I have discussed that before, didn’t we? Didn’t we decide they must have been rushed into releasing their first drafts?

I hated Kingdom of Heaven so much, but then I saw it in theatres I think.

I’m curious what you felt didn’t work about the Butterfly Effect, writing-wise. The only thing I really saw that didn’t work was that jail scene, cause it broke the rules they’d already established (ie, someone in the present being aware of changes in the past).

3   jordan    http://www.everydayfiction.com
January 8th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

And btw, the Outer Limits was both the best show on television and also the worst. I’ve never seen such an uneven show. To say that tBE was a good episode of OL is saying a lot.

4   outofafrica    http://www.outofafrica98.blogspot.com
January 26th, 2009 at 6:00 am

I also saw the movie for the first time as the director’s cut and thought it was amazing and deeply disturbing

5   Jordan Lapp    
February 11th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

Howdy outofafrica,

I compare B.E. to the Sixth Sense. Both are extremely well done and very clever–the way fiction should be.

6   sophia    
January 15th, 2011 at 4:07 pm

Ashton stabs himself in the hands because the guy he was imprisoned with was religious. so to prove to his prison budy that he had ‘special power’ he made ‘religious’(stigmata) marks on himself.

7   Jordan Lapp    http://www.jordanlapp.com
January 17th, 2011 at 11:36 am

Hi sophia,

Thanks for your comment!

I got why that incident helped him, but remember Ashton’s whole life is always different after he time travels because the changes he makes alters the timeline not just in the “present”, but when they actually happened.

To make things a little clearer, since Ashton’s injury happens when he’s a child the timeline after that would change and he would have had those scars when he entered the prison. They would have surely been noticed by our inmate before that point.

From the inmate’s point of view, Ashton reads a note then shows him scars that he had when he entered the prison–no miracle is apparent.

One Trackback/Ping

  1. best iphone games    Feb 26 2012 / 6am:

    best iphone games…

    [...]The Butterfly Effect–Theatrical vs. Director’s Cut – Without Really Trying[...]…

Leave a reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment