If you only saw the Butterfly Effect in the theaters, it’s time to gave it another look.
First time I saw this movie was on DVD, and I thought it was amazing. It was almost perfectly constructed, with only one notable plot hole (where Ashton’s character stabs himself in the hands). I wondered at the time why it wasn’t a bigger hit.
Then I watched the Theatrical version on DVD. Wow. The ending was terrible. And I mean terrible. It’s tough not to discuss this without giving away what happens, but let’s just say that the Director’s Cut, while extremely awesome, might have been a little too challenging for the American Public, whereas the Theatrical Version was probably Watered-Down But Acceptable.
I noticed that it was the writers themselves who directed this movie, so that neatly explains its dual nature. They shot the movie they wrote, showed it to a producer who was all like, “you can’t show that to the American Public”, and were forced to re-shoot with the horrible compromise.
The message here is that if writers direct a movie, you should listen to them. Produces gave the Wachowski Brothers a lot of leeway and we got the Matrix. Matt Damon and Ben Affleck gave us Good Will Hunting. I feel certain the Butterfly Effect would have enjoyed the same success if Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber had been able to make the movie they wanted to make.
best iphone games…
[...]The Butterfly Effect–Theatrical vs. Director’s Cut – Without Really Trying[...]…